GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws, classic
90-99: Top tier, worthy of the highest ... read more
GRADING REFERENCE:
0-9: Unlistenable
10-19: Uninteresting in any way, terrible
20-29: Lazy, poorly produced and written
30-39: Shows potential, however comfortably bad
40-49: Slightly worse than average / poor writing OR producing
50-59: Slightly better than average, lacks in one crucial area
60-69: Good, strong points outweigh bad ones on average
70-79: Would recommend, strong overall with slight defects
80-89: Incredible, hardly any flaws
90-99: Classic, worthy of the highest praises
100: My ... read more
1
Create an account to rate and review albums.
Recent Review Comments
On Tyler, The Creator - DON'T TAP THE GLASS
"@WistroReviews I don’t particularly enjoy that track. The part halfway through the song ruins it for me, on top of the fact I just don’t like it overall."
On ikmmm's review of Kanye West - BULLY
"@ikmmm Okay, but you wrote ~4 paragraphs worth of writing, so you could easily have just explained why you disliked it rather than… this? A semi thought out review would be much more effective, so if you’re going to write a review (which I’d assume would be to make some sort of point or persuade others) just write something worthy of thought."
On MaddoxSmith48's review of Kanye West - BULLY
"@Krumm Yeah, I kind of got the impression that Ye only started caring about the album till later in the rollout, but he works pretty well with deadlines. I’m just glad we got a Ye level album (imo), and the fact that the best songs on the album are the NEW ones makes me hopeful for Ye’s work going forward."
On Metsic's review of Kanye West - BULLY
"Imo it was really cool to see Ye merge a lot of his sounds from past albums into Bully, there are a couple songs in this album I could see fitting in his past work."
On delicasali's review of Kanye West - BULLY
"You’ll probably like the rest of his discography if you enjoyed WTT. Cool review!"
On ikmmm's review of Kanye West - BULLY
"As a general rule of thumb, if you’re unable to articulate your disdain for an album without constantly resorting to curse words or using a specific example it’s a poor review."
On MaddoxSmith48's review of Kanye West - BULLY
"Curious as to where you get your album rating given those track ratings. Furthermore, White Lines isn't AI until the VERY END of that song (which imo is an artistic choice, and a solid one at that) so if that is what you're basing the negative review on it for it doesn't make any sense. Also the "good tracks" didn't have AI on them. I don't want this comment to come off across as I'm in any way "pro-AI," as I'm most certainly not, however I'd hardly call these tracks slop (except maybe circles). As far as I'm aware the delays were likely because of Ye resting/getting help with his bi-polar, and there was clearly a point for the delay if the album features 8 new songs. Have a splendid day/night."
On bfust's review of Kanye West - BULLY
"You could very well argue that there are some production errors within Bully, but simply just saying “poorly written” without any clear example of poor writing is a terrible review for any piece of work. The lack of explanation is arguably worse when the popular consensus is that the given piece of media is decently written. I am in no way trying to discredit you, but I’m curious as to what specifically makes you think that Ye forgot how to write a song."
On Lavabounce's review of Tyler, The Creator - DON'T TAP THE GLASS
"I’ve seen this criticism a lot and it makes 0 sense. Actually listen to his music for like 15 seconds and the songs are so vastly different it’s comical. But no, yeah, you’re right! Yonkers, See you again, Corso, Deathcamp, She, 911/Mr lonely, St. Chroma, and Big Poe all sound like the exact same song!"
On Scientificman's review of Tyler, The Creator - DON'T TAP THE GLASS
"I don’t think mommanem is supposed to be a proper song, it comes across as more of an interlude to build up stop playing with me. Also, I don’t rlly get your critique with the bass line, I feel if you were to take that out the songs would feel almost empty and it enhances the dance/hype vibe going to it."
Advertisement